We Help People Dealing With Aging By Curating Relevant Information and News About Aging and Anti-Aging.

getting-older-news-logo

Uncovering the Truth: Debunking Anti Aging Myths

By Tom Seest

Is Anti Aging Really Harmful?

At GettingOlderNews, we help people who want to learn more about aging and anti-aging.

As a beauty editor, I have heard enough anti-age rhetoric to realize its outdatedness and unhelpfulness. It promotes an unrealistic beauty ideal that many women struggle to live up to.
Use of a healthy diet and refraining from activities which hasten the aging process can slow its pace. Men may benefit from using HGH releasers and collagen boosters; similarly, for women these supplements could include HGH releasers and collagen boosters respectively.

Is Anti Aging Really Harmful?

Is Anti Aging Really Harmful?

Is Anti-Aging Worth the High Price Tag?

The anti-aging industry has made a fortune by exploiting people’s fear of growing older. By turning our collective preference for youth into an enormous market for expensive skin care products and cosmetic procedures such as Botox or face lifts, money spent by “anti-aging” businesses provides their term with legitimacy necessary for funding or sales purposes – often by cherry-picking positive studies while disregarding many failures; or marketing to consumers who lack scientific literacy but can be easily persuaded.
Aspiring to look youthful is natural and should not be treated as problematic in itself; however, when vanity becomes mobilized by commerce and driven by profit motives it becomes oppressive and excessive. Once businesses make it their duty to pressure us into purchasing their products then real danger arises.
Some anti-aging skincare brands market their product by promising that it prevents cross-linked molecules called AGPs from forming in the body, which damage cells and cause fine lines and wrinkles. Although this may be true, cheaper products such as Olay or Boots No7 face cream have proven just as effective through independent tests; but for overall improvement nothing beats Retin A/Tretinoin which are readily available and inexpensive solutions.

Is Anti-Aging Worth the High Price Tag?

Is Anti-Aging Worth the High Price Tag?

Is Anti Aging Really a Waste of Time?

Anti-aging has come to be associated with overpriced cosmetics marketed directly to consumers and has resulted in an explosion of noise and nonsense that undermines serious longevity research. Scientists and more established businesses within this field are appalled by this tactic that exploits age-related fears for financial gain; perception of legitimacy plays a large part in funding decisions made for scientific research as well as revenues generated for businesses; thus, this battle over anti-aging damages the future of human longevity.
The anti-aging movement asserts that it is possible to slow biological aging and extend life by managing disease and preventing cell decline. Many methods recommended by this movement, such as exercise and healthy nutrition, have the support of experts in their respective fields; other practices like hormone treatment have less scientific backing or aren’t evidence-based.
One of the most disconcerting elements of the anti-aging movement is its neoliberal tendencies, which promote the idea that it is an individual’s responsibility and moral imperative to pursue anti-aging lifestyles in order to live longer. Anti-aging medicine practitioners also reinforce normative ideas about what it means to age well; for instance, they emphasize disease avoidance over social activities like travel, gardening, or golf (Depp & Jeste 2006).
Anti-aging has become an industry unto itself, long ahead of what medical science can actually accomplish to reverse and eradicate aging. Spending on anti-aging products is wasted money that only highlights our current knowledge on human aging compared with what modern medicine can accomplish for us; real anti-aging medicines could change lives dramatically and allow for longer, healthier lives; instead of turning towards such products for profits in an anti-aging marketplace, efforts should instead be put forth towards supporting longevity research instead of making quick profits on them.

Is Anti Aging Really a Waste of Time?

Is Anti Aging Really a Waste of Time?

Is Anti Aging Really Unscientific?

Anti-aging research continues to divide scientists, physicians, and entrepreneurs. With their goal being creating real medical treatments that extend healthy lifespans, there’s been much rhetoric around anti-aging medicine, but fighting over semantics won’t get us there; better medicine and an environment more supportive of longevity research are what will get us there.
Scientists tend to dislike the term anti-aging because it implies a treatment against actual aging itself; most approaches for prolonging lifespan focus more on fighting diseases related to age that threaten our lifespans than directly fighting aging itself. Furthermore, it can be hard to define exactly when someone starts aging since there’s no way of knowing your exact age at any moment in time.
Researchers are taking steps to halt the aging process by targeting specific disease processes and their molecular pathways, such as blood glucose levels, inflammation levels, or blocking cell signaling pathways. Some researchers even attempt to rewind time by restoring stem cells back to their more youthful states.
These approaches are still in their infancy; developing drugs to extend health plans could take decades and be costly; even if breakthroughs are made, they won’t necessarily prevent people from dying or developing other illnesses that have no correlation to aging.
Investors and tech tycoons alike have invested billions into research on aging in hopes of unlocking human biology and prolonging healthy lives. Already, there have been exciting breakthroughs, like Shinya Yamanaka’s discovery that adult cells can rewind back to embryonic states and Kristen Fortney at Rejuvenate Therapeutics, who is optimizing genes for greater longevity.
So it is no wonder that the public remains so confused over which anti aging treatments to trust. Until we actually have effective longevity treatments available to us, it would be wise to forego hype in favor of science; once such technology existed to extend healthy lifespans by several years at once, no one would debate its definition!

Is Anti Aging Really Unscientific?

Is Anti Aging Really Unscientific?

Is Anti Aging Really Disruptive?

There is currently a heated struggle over what constitutes “anti-aging,” both scientifically and commercially. Those who produce effective, accurately marketed anti-aging products fight hard to keep the anti-aging label for themselves while condemning any scammers or exploiters who try to piggyback off its popularity for financial gain. It’s an unruly, chaotic marketplace with fraudulent practices often in play.
Scientists and physicians who take issue with the term anti-aging have proposed alternatives, including age management medicine or advanced preventive or interventive biogerontology; however, the debate over its label remains focused mainly on money and perceived legitimacy.
If we had therapies to dramatically extend healthy human lifespans, I don’t believe we would be so divided over the semantics of the term aging. Aging is at the root of many devastating illnesses which cripple society; draining healthcare systems and economies around the globe; including debilitating conditions like arthritis, heart disease, cancer, dementia, osteoporosis, diabetes, and hypertension, among many more.
As many diseases associated with aging are caused by the passage of time, it would make sense for us to find ways to slow or even reverse its process in order to alleviate much of the pain, suffering, and early mortality caused by these illnesses.
Real anti-aging medicines do not exist yet, leaving us only with interventions such as calorie restriction or lifestyle modifications that add a few years to our average lifespan. While these may help, these are just initial steps on the journey towards more advanced longevity technologies that could offer long-term protection.
Transhumanists believe these technologies and others, such as CRISPR gene editing and computer-brain interfaces, could become powerful weapons against aging, yet real anti-aging solutions may take longer, requiring activism, investment, and support rather than current marketplace sales tactics.

Is Anti Aging Really Disruptive?

Is Anti Aging Really Disruptive?

Be sure to read our other related stories at GettingOlderNews to learn more about aging and anti-aging.